ONE LEVEL DEEPER
XEL
Warren Buffett frameworkThe Owner-OperatorBenjamin Graham frameworkThe Value ArchitectMichael Mauboussin frameworkThe Expectations EngineerHoward Marks frameworkThe Cycle WhispererPeter Lynch frameworkThe Everyday Edge

At 1.29% earnings yield versus 4.33% treasuries, this utility prices growth it cannot deliver with -$3.87B operating cash flow.

cautiousBearishconviction

A regulated utility trading at 19.4x earnings with negative operating cash flow presents the classic Marks warning — when everyone agrees on safety, the price creates the risk.

THE LENSES
PRICE VS VALUEexpensive

Is the price above or below what the business is worth?

Trading at 19.4x earnings with 1.29% earnings yield vs 4.33% treasury yield
DCF valuation of $226.30 vs market price of $80.74 suggests 64% discount
EV/EBITDA of 54.48 at 73rd percentile historically
Earnings yield at 10-year low despite 21-year guidance accuracy record

This framework sees a dangerous disconnect — either the DCF model is wildly wrong or the market knows something about the -$3.87B operating cash flow that the model doesn't capture. The negative 304 basis point spread to treasuries demands exceptional growth that regulated utilities rarely deliver.

Earnings Yield
WHEN EVERYONE AGREEScrowded

Is universal agreement creating risk?

Institutional ownership at 95.2%, up from 93% last quarter
Insiders net buying for 9 consecutive quarters totaling $13.8M
Analyst targets clustered at $82-95 with moderate dispersion
Both groups accumulating despite -$3.87B operating cash flow

Maximum institutional ownership combined with sustained insider buying creates the crowded trade that Marks warns about. When 95% of shares are held by institutions and insiders keep buying despite accounting red flags, contrarian alarm bells should ring.

Analyst Consensus
Strong Buy
0
Buy
16
Hold
8
Sell
2
Strong Sell
0
CYCLE TEMPERATUREoverheated

Where are we in the cycle?

Operating margin of 24.6% at 83rd percentile
Gross margin collapsed to -48.8% at 0th percentile
ROIC data unavailable but capex intensity doubled to 173% of OCF
Revenue growth of 9.1% TTM near cycle highs for regulated utility

Multiple metrics at simultaneous extremes signal late-cycle dynamics. The operating margin at 83rd percentile while gross margin hits all-time lows reveals unsustainable cost pressures that regulatory relief may not fix fast enough.

Operating Margin
ASYMMETRYunfavorable

Does the upside significantly exceed the downside?

Market expects 2.5x larger moves on positive surprises than negative
Trading at 82.6% of 52-week range after 37.4% drawdown recovery
P/E at 25th percentile historically but expensive vs treasuries
Negative OCF creates financing risk for $60B capex plan

The asymmetry works against investors — limited upside from already-high valuations but substantial downside if accounting issues persist or rate relief disappoints. This framework sees poor risk/reward at current levels.

P/E Ratio
KEY NUMBERS
VERDICT

Applying the Marks framework reveals a textbook case of consensus creating risk — 95% institutional ownership in a regulated utility trading at cycle-high valuations with unprecedented accounting divergences. The pendulum has swung to complacency about a "safe" utility that shows anything but safe cash flow dynamics. When boring companies become exciting investments at 19x earnings, isn't that precisely when Marks would step aside?

This analysis applies Howard Marks's published investment framework to publicly available financial data. It is not authored by, endorsed by, or affiliated with Howard Marks. Educational purposes only. Not financial advice.

OTHER PERSPECTIVES
Warren Buffett framework
The Owner-Operator
Neutral
Peter Lynch framework
The Everyday Edge
Neutral
Michael Mauboussin framework
The Expectations Engineer
Leaning Bearish
Benjamin Graham framework
The Value Architect
Bearish
Explore
Cintas CorporationCTASAtlassian CorporationTEAMZscaler, Inc.ZSBaker Hughes CompanyBKRPalantir Technologies Inc.PLTRApple Inc.AAPL
EDUCATIONAL ONLY · NOT FINANCIAL ADVICEv2