Benjamin Graham's Framework on Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)

At 66x EBITDA, Roper's valuation eliminates any margin of safety despite generating $2.49B in free cash flow.

cautiousNeutralconviction

At 66x EBITDA and 0.90% earnings yield versus 4.33% treasuries, Roper demands heroic growth assumptions despite solid fundamentals.

THE LENSES

THE MARGIN OF SAFETYvulnerable

Does the price protect me from permanent loss of capital?

•Trading at 66.12x EV/EBITDA in Q4'25, in bottom 10th percentile historically

•Current price $315.53 implies 65.6% discount to DCF fair value

•Market implies only 1.02% perpetual growth despite 12.3% trailing FCF growth

•Stock down 46.9% from March 2025 peak of $593.81

The extreme EBITDA multiple eliminates any margin of safety despite the DCF discount. This framework sees a price that assumes perfection — any stumble in execution or growth deceleration risks significant capital loss.

EV / EBITDA

EARNINGS YIELD VS BONDSinadequate

Does the equity risk premium justify ownership versus treasuries?

•Earnings yield of 0.90% versus 4.33% treasury yield

•Negative 3.43% spread demands exceptional growth to justify

•TTM revenue growth 12.3% and FCF growth 12.3% in Q4'25

•P/E ratio of 27.85 in 18th percentile of 10-year range

The negative spread to treasuries is severe even for a growth company. While 12.3% growth could theoretically close this gap over time, this framework requires compensation for equity risk today, not promises of future catch-up.

Earnings Yield

THE EARNINGS RECORDexceptional

Has the company demonstrated consistent earnings over many years?

•Revenue grew from $1.51B to $2.06B quarterly over data period

•Operating margins improved to 36.6% in Q4'25

•Beat earnings estimates in 97.4% of 39 tracked quarters

•Net income positive and growing consistently through entire period

The earnings record is exemplary with near-perfect estimate beats and consistent growth. This framework values such demonstrated stability highly — Roper has proven it can generate earnings reliably across various conditions.

Revenue

BALANCE SHEET FORTRESSadequate

Can the company survive a prolonged downturn?

•Debt-to-equity ratio 0.72 in Q4'25

•Current ratio 0.76 indicates tight liquidity

•Interest coverage 8.06x provides adequate debt service margin

•FCF of $2.49B annually versus modest debt burden

The balance sheet is adequate but not fortress-like. Low current ratio suggests working capital constraints, though strong cash generation provides flexibility. This framework prefers more conservative financial structures.

Debt / Equity

KEY NUMBERS

VERDICT

Applying this framework reveals a paradox: exceptional business quality trapped in a valuation that offers no protection. The 0.90% earnings yield against 4.33% treasuries violates Graham's cardinal rule of demanding compensation for equity risk. While the earnings record and resilience are admirable, at 66x EBITDA the price assumes a future this framework cannot underwrite. Would Graham pay 111 years of earnings for even the finest business?

This analysis applies Benjamin Graham's published investment framework to publicly available financial data. It is not authored by, endorsed by, or affiliated with Benjamin Graham. Educational purposes only. Not financial advice.

OTHER PERSPECTIVES

Warren Buffett framework

The Owner-Operator

Bullish→

Michael Mauboussin framework

The Expectations Engineer

Bullish→

Howard Marks framework

The Cycle Whisperer

Bullish→

Peter Lynch framework

The Everyday Edge