ONE LEVEL DEEPER
CSGP
Warren Buffett frameworkThe Owner-OperatorBenjamin Graham frameworkThe Value ArchitectMichael Mauboussin frameworkThe Expectations EngineerHoward Marks frameworkThe Cycle WhispererPeter Lynch frameworkThe Everyday Edge

At 199% above intrinsic value, CoStar offers the opposite of margin of safety at $39.98 versus $13.36 fair value.

cautiousBearishconviction

This framework sees a business trading at 149x earnings while burning $150.6M quarterly — the antithesis of margin of safety.

THE LENSES
THE MARGIN OF SAFETYdangerous

Does the price protect me from permanent loss of capital?

Price trades 199% above DCF fair value of $13.36
P/E ratio of 149x sits at 88th percentile over 10 years
Market implies 7.41% perpetual growth vs 18.7% trailing growth
Stock at $39.98 would need to fall 66% to reach DCF value

This framework sees no margin of safety whatsoever. The price demands not just perfection but sustained miracles, with the stock needing to fall two-thirds to reach fair value. At 149x earnings, even a return to historical median multiples would devastate capital.

P/E Ratio
EARNINGS YIELD VS BONDSirrational

Does equity risk offer adequate compensation over bonds?

Earnings yield of 0.17% vs 4.33% treasury yield
Negative 4.16% spread to risk-free rate
Would need 25x earnings growth to match treasury yield
Revenue growth of 18.7% cannot close this gap for years

Applying this lens reveals an investment offering one-twenty-fifth the return of risk-free treasuries. Even with 18.7% revenue growth, the earnings yield remains deeply unattractive. This framework would never accept 0.17% returns when bonds pay 4.33% with zero risk.

Earnings Yield
BALANCE SHEET FORTRESSadequate

Can this company survive a prolonged downturn?

Cash of $1.73B with negative net debt of $589M
Current ratio plummeted to 2.84, lowest in 10 years
Burning $150.6M quarterly at current capex intensity
Interest coverage remains comfortable with minimal debt

The balance sheet shows strength with substantial cash and negative net debt, though liquidity ratios have deteriorated markedly. However, at the current burn rate of $150.6M quarterly, even this fortress could be depleted in 11 quarters without operational improvement.

Current Ratio
THE PRICE YOU PAYexcessive

What do I receive per dollar of price paid?

For each dollar paid: $0.0067 of earnings (149x P/E)
EV/EBITDA of 210.45x far exceeds any reasonable range
Capex intensity surged from 7.5% to 34.7% of revenue
Free cash flow turned negative despite $162M operating cash

This framework finds the price unconscionable — paying $149 for $1 of earnings while the business consumes cash at record rates. The 210x EBITDA multiple and negative free cash flow make this among the most expensive propositions in the market.

EV / EBITDA
KEY NUMBERS
VERDICT

Applying the Graham framework to CoStar reveals a speculation, not an investment. At 149x earnings with negative free cash flow and deteriorating margins, the price offers no protection against capital loss — only exposure to it. The framework would wait for Mr. Market to offer a price with a margin of safety, perhaps after reality tempers current euphoria. When treasury bills pay 4.33% risk-free, why accept 0.17% with substantial risk?

This analysis applies Benjamin Graham's published investment framework to publicly available financial data. It is not authored by, endorsed by, or affiliated with Benjamin Graham. Educational purposes only. Not financial advice.

OTHER PERSPECTIVES
Michael Mauboussin framework
The Expectations Engineer
Leaning Bullish
Peter Lynch framework
The Everyday Edge
Neutral
Warren Buffett framework
The Owner-Operator
Leaning Bearish
Howard Marks framework
The Cycle Whisperer
Bearish
Explore
Booking Holdings Inc.BKNGAxon Enterprise, Inc.AXONNetflix, Inc.NFLXFortinet, Inc.FTNTLam Research CorporationLRCXAmazon.com, Inc.AMZN
EDUCATIONAL ONLY · NOT FINANCIAL ADVICEv2